One of the best Videos on the subject yet....

Two Presidents - No Spine

The Obama campaign continues to come under fire for releasing the ad shown below this week that questions whether Mitt Romney would have ordered the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. The ad is appalling, on so many levels.

The Navy Seals have complained, even Arianna Huffington has complained. And it has to be said: If you're a liberal and you lose Arianna Huffington from your side, you've gone too far.

I think we can all agree that President Obama was the guy in charge when Osama bin Laden was taken down and he deserves some credit for his actions, but to claim that presidential hopeful, Mitt Romney would not have done it, to raise that question, goes way too far.

But even more disgusting is what former President Bill Clinton says in his narration of the video ad about Mr. Obama: "Suppose the Navy Seals had gone in there and it hadn't been Bin Laden. Suppose they'd been captured or killed. The downside would've been horrible for him."

See this ridiculous Ad Called "One Chance" here 

The focus of  the Obama APPROVED comment by Bill Clinton is that Obama’s great bravery in the face of potential POLITICAL FALLOUT…It’s shameful. There appears to be ZERO consideration for the military personnel carrying out the dangerous mission abroad.

Additional light is shed when you consider the topic of yesterday’s Lunch-Alert at Dick Morris.com Where Dick discussed the Clinton-Obama deal recently arranged so that Hillary Clinton could finally pay off some of her remaining campaign debt. Yes it still lingers from her efforts to obtain the Whitehouse in 2008. Obama agreed to raise several million for Hillary if William Jefferson Clinton would narrate the ad you saw at the link above.

What is especially hypocritical here is that Bill Clinton himself had the opportunity to take out Osama bin Laden back in 1999. He was advised by the military that they had good Intel on where he was located. Clinton chose NOT to act. Some could argue that if he had acted back then in 1999 – 9/11 may have been an ordinary day in 2001. 

Obama's False Change

If I wanted America to Fail...

As Fox News has reported, "An American flag with President Obama's image in place of the stars flew over a Florida county's Democrat headquarters long enough to enrage local veterans who called the altered banner 'a disgrace.'"

Lake County Democratic Party officials took down the flag, which flew just below a standard Old Glory on the flagpole outside headquarters in Tavares following complaints by local veterans. But merely taking it down wasn't enough for several local veterans, who said they fought for the flag Betsy Ross made famous, not one with a politician on it.

"It's absolutely disrespectful," Jim Bradford, a 71-year-old veteran who participated in the Bay of Pigs Invasion told FoxNews.com. "It's totally ridiculous. To put somebody's picture there, to me, it's a disgrace to do that."

Oh, and here's the kicker... the Obama flag was made in China! What a fitting touch.

Sign, Sign Everywhere a Sign!

The sign above is posted on the Road just outside Nairobi, Kenya.

But that is not all....Get ready... you might not really believe this one!

The First Lady experiences a slip of the tongue: She said What! Obama's home country is where?

I'm sure they will come up with some story line about how she didn't really mean what she just said... but just in case... share this as quickly as you can before it gets pulled off YouTube.

Government Motors - Learn the Obama Spin Technique

The Competitive Enterprise Institute today filed a formal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, arguing that General Motors misleadingly claimed in a national TV ad that the company has paid back taxpayer bailout loans.
In the complaint, CEI urges the FTC to investigate the GM ad campaign entitled “GM Repaid Government Loan Ahead of Schedule.” The ad features GM’s Chairman and CEO, Ed Whitacre, who declares that “we have repaid our government loan in full, with interest, five years ahead of the original schedule.”
That claim, CEI explains in the complaint, “gives the false impression that GM has used its own funds to pay back all the bailout money that it received from the federal government. In fact, GM has only repaid a fraction of those funds—barely ten percent. Moreover, GM apparently repaid its loan by using other federal funds.”
To add insult to injury, GM’s misleading ad could unfairly dupe consumers into a false, renewed confidence in the company, the complaint explains. “Consumer purchasing decisions can easily be affected by such considerations, as the FTC has long recognized in prohibiting false claims that products are ‘Made in the U.S.A.’”
Sam Kazman, CEI General Counsel, points out the real-world absurdity of GM’s claim. “If I applied for a car loan using GM’s financially misleading approach, I’d be tossed out of the dealership on my ear.”
“GM might argue that its ad is literally accurate, but the fact is it’s completely misleading,” said Hans Bader, CEI counsel.
CEI urges the FTC to promptly investigate, to “serve the American public on this issue of major consumer and taxpayer importance [and] “discourage other beneficiaries of government bailouts from falsely misrepresenting their status.”

Pulling back the Curtain - Alinsky and Obama

What is really behind President Obama's claims that America is not a Christian nation? What about his recent mistreatment of Israel and his warm enbrace of all that seems to be Muslim?

President Obama's Mentor Saul Alinsky, in his own book, actually aligns himself and his teachings with Satan. That's right the Devil himself. Did America know what they were getting into when they opened the door of the White House to this man? A quick flip ten pages into this book,
http://www.amazon.com/Rules-Radicals-Saul-Alinsky/dp/0679721134#reader_0679721134

Saul Alinsky's book “Rules for Radicals” reveals the following dedication to Lucifer

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer

Also, just in case the use of Alinsky's ideas, strategies and materials by the liberal left has escaped any ones attention, please consider the following important links:

Michele Obama quotes Saul Alinsky in her speeches: http://dailyradar.com/beltwayblips/story/michelle_obama_used_lines_from_saul_alinsky_s_book/

Saul Alinsky's son notes how successfully Obama is following his fathers plans: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=75101

Hillary Clinton wrote her "hidden" thesis on Saul Alinsky: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17388372/ns/politics-decision_08/page/2/

A good analysis of Alinsky's book: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11958

And yet another: http://donstorch.com/2009/04/19/obama-rules-for-radicals/

Another important link to look at is how One Tea Party team is arming them selves with the playbook of the enemy. Being forewarned is forearmed I always say!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19154573/Rules-for-Radicals-Training-PDF

Fighting With One Arm Tied Behind Barack

President Obama said Monday that he was revamping American nuclear strategy to substantially narrow the conditions under which the United States would use nuclear weapons, even in self defense. This is a radical departure from the policies of every president since the creation of nuclear weapons.

Mr. Obama’s strategy is a sharp shift from those adopted by his predecessors and seeks to revamp the nation’s nuclear posture for a new age in which rogue states and terrorist organizations are greater threats than traditional powers like Russia and China.

Perhaps this action is just another apology to the world for our nations policies

For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons, or launched a crippling cyberattack.

The complete story can be found here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/06arms.html

Happy Atheist Holiday - April 1st, 2010

In Florida, an atheist became incensed over the preparation for Easter and Passover holidays and decided to contact his lawyer about the discrimination inflicted on atheists by the constant celebrations afforded to Christians and Jews with all their holidays while the atheists had no holiday to celebrate.
The case was brought before a wise judge who after listening to the long, passionate presentation of his lawyer, promptly banged his gavel and declared, "Case dismissed!"
The lawyer immediately stood and objected to the ruling and said, "Your honor, how can you possibly dismiss this case? Surely the Christians have Christmas, Easter and many other observances. And the Jews -- why in addition to Passover they have Yom Kippur and Hanukkah... and yet my client and all other atheists have no such holiday!"
The judge leaned forward in his chair and simply said "Obviously your client is too confused to know about or to celebrate the atheists' holiday!"
The lawyer pompously said "We are aware of no such holiday for atheists, just when might that be, your honor?"
The judge said "Well it comes every year on exactly the same date-- April 1st!"
"The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'"Psalm 14:1, Psalm 53:1